Chem Explorers

Decoding the Chemistry: Choosing the Best Reaction Pathway

The Chemistry behind Choosing Between S N 1, S N 2, E1, and E2 Reactions

Chemistry students are often faced with complex reactions that involve a variety of factors that must be considered when choosing the best approach. These reactions include S N 1, S N 2, E1, and E2, which offer different pathways to the desired product.

In this article, we will delve into the world of these reactions and explore how we can select the best approach for a given reaction scenario.

Bimolecular Reactions in S N 2 and E2

The S N 2 and E2 reactions are referred to as bimolecular reactions due to the involvement of two molecules in the rate-determining step. In an S N 2 reaction, the incoming nucleophile attacks the substrate carbon, causing the leaving group to be expelled simultaneously.

This substitution reaction mainly occurs with primary and secondary substrates but is not suitable for tertiary substrates due to steric hindrance. In contrast, E2 reactions involve the movement of two atoms in one step, resulting in the elimination of a molecule of the leaving group.

This reaction type typically favors strong bases or nucleophiles that can hinder the reaction by removing the hydrogen without the need for a proton to be present.

Strong Base or Nucleophile for S N 2 and E2

The choice of a strong base or nucleophile is crucial in determining the S N 2 or E2 reaction type. Strong bases are competitive nucleophiles that can hinder an S N 2 reaction by giving a nucleophile competition.

On the other hand, weak bases are more suitable for S N 2 reactions.

Steric Hindrance and Choosing Between S N 2 and E2

A molecule’s structure plays a significant role in S N 2 and E2 reactions. For instance, tertiary substrates in S N 2 reactions are less likely to proceed due to steric hindrance, while primary substrates are generally more reactive.

Therefore, in cases where the substrate has a tertiary structure, an E2 reaction will be more favorable.

Unimolecular Reactions in S N 1 and E1

Unimolecular reactions refer to S N 1 and E1, which involve only one molecule. In S N 1 reactions, the substrate’s departure results in a carbocation intermediate, which is then attacked by the incoming nucleophile.

However, this process is significantly slower than S N 2 reactions, making the unimolecular reaction rate-determining. E1 reactions, on the other hand, involve the formation of a carbocation intermediate, which experiences an elimination reaction from the solvent or base.

Weak nucleophiles/base are the best suits for E1 reactions.

Choosing Between S N 1 and E1

In many cases, choosing between S N 1 and E1 reactions can be challenging. The reaction outcome is primarily determined by the solvent’s polarity and temperature.

Higher temperature favors E1, while polar solvents favor S N 1.

Weak Reactants for S N 1 and E1

Weak reactants, such as water and alcohols, make the reaction slow due to a lack of a strong nucleophile/base to attack the substrate. In such cases, S N 1 and E1 reactions will be more feasible.

Heat and E1 Reactions

When E1 reactions are temperature-controlled, the product obtained is typically an alkene with the carbon-carbon double bond configuration set based on the Zaitsev or Hofmann elimination rule. Flowchart Choice: S N 2 vs.


A flowchart is an effective tool to help choose between S N 2 and E2 reactions. S N 2 reactions are preferred for primary and secondary substrates with weak nucleophiles and low temperatures.

E2 reactions are best suited for substrates with a tertiary structure, non-bulky bases, and a high-temperature reaction environment. In conclusion, the chemistry behind choosing between S N 1, S N 2, E1, and E2 reactions can be challenging at first.

However, understanding the foundation and application of these reactions helps in making the right choices. Furthermore, the type of substrate, the strength of the nucleophile/base, the solvent polarity, and the temperature are significant factors to consider when selecting the appropriate approach.

Students can apply flowcharts to make informed choices. With patience and practice, students can tackle any reaction challenge presented to them.

S N 2 or E2: Choosing Between Strong Base/Nucleophile

One of the most crucial factors in choosing between S N 2 and E2 reactions is the choice of strong base or nucleophile. As a general rule, the stronger the base or nucleophile, the more likely it is to favor the E2 pathway.

Conversely, non-basic, non-sterically hindered nucleophiles favor the S N 2 pathway. In addition, other factors such as steric hindrance and substrate structure heavily influence the reaction pathway.

Strong Bases: Taking us to the Right Side

The strength of the base plays a significant role in deciding the reaction pathway. The rule “strong bases take us to the right side” should be kept in mind when choosing a reaction pathway.

Generally, strong bases promote E2 reactions by acting as a catalyst for the elimination mechanism, and a strong nucleophile, on the other hand, helps favor an S N reaction.

Non-Sterically Hindered Basic Nucleophiles and S N 2

The strength of the nucleophile determines its ability to displace the leaving group in an S N 2 reaction. Non-sterically hindered, basic nucleophiles such as hydroxide, cyanide, and amines can readily participate in S N 2 reactions by displacing the leaving group and forming a new bond with the substrate’s carbon atom.

Bulky, Non-Basic Nucleophiles and E2

When dealing with bulky nucleophiles, the reaction pathway changes towards an E2 reaction. They usually cannot displace the leaving group and hence initiate elimination when their hydrogens are adjacent to the carbon with the leaving group.

Examples of bulky nucleophiles include N-methylaniline, t-butoxide or t-pentoxide.

Bulky, Strong Base = E2 Only

Strong bases like hydroxide and butoxide tend to promote E2 reactions over S N 2.

However, when the base is bulky and strong, it imparts a high degree of steric hindrance that decreases its nucleophilicity, making it unsuitable for S N 2 reactions. Thus, bulky and strong bases promote only E2 reaction pathways.

Non-Bulky Strong Base: Primary Substrates = S N 2, Secondary or Tertiary Substrates = E2

The reactivity of a primary, secondary, or tertiary substrate also plays a significant role. Non-bulky strong bases such as sodium methoxide and sodium ethoxide promote S N 2 reactions with primary substrates.

In contrast, in secondary and tertiary substrates, the bulkier transition state decreases rates of S N 2 reactions in favor of E2 reactions. Therefore, in secondary and tertiary substrates, E2 reactions are the dominant pathway, making the substrate structure essential in defining the reaction mechanism.

Effect of Solvent on Nucleophilicity and Basicity

The solvent is not the main determinant of reaction pathway, but it can have a significant effect on nucleophilicity and basicity. Solvents can be divided into two types: polar protic and polar aprotic solvents.

Polar Protic Solvents Favor S N 1 and E1 Reactions

Polar protic solvents possess hydrogen bonding and are known to stabilize charged ions via solvation. They tend to increase the energy of nucleophiles and lower that of leaving groups, promoting S N 1 and E1 reactions by stabilizing intermediates and preventing the ionization of leaving groups.

For instance, when the solvent is water or methanol, the S N 1 reaction is preferred due to the solvation of intermediates and stabilization of the carbocation.

Polar Aprotic Solvents Favor S N 2 and E2 Reactions

In contrast, polar aprotic solvents are insufficiently solvated and do not favor the solvation of charged species, leading to a decrease in cation stability. They promote nucleophilicity and are considered to be inert toward ions.

Thus, polar aprotic solvents favor S N 2 and E2 reactions pathway, with the absence of solvation leading to a faster nucleophilic attack on the substrate carbon. For instance, polar aprotic solvents such as DMF, DMSO, and acetone favor S N 2 reactions.

In conclusion, choosing between S N 2 and E2 reactions requires a thorough understanding of the substrate structure, the strength of the base/nucleophile, and the nature of the solvent. Bulky, non-basic nucleophiles tend to favor E2 reactions and hence make the choice of strong base an essential step.

Furthermore, solvents can also have a significant impact on nucleophilicity and basicity, with polar aprotic solvents favoring S N 2 and E2 reactions and polar protic solvents favoring S N 1 and E1 reactions. Exceptions and Mixture of Compounds in S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 Reactions

Selecting the appropriate reaction pathway between S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 requires a deep understanding of various factors, such as the substrate, solvent, and strength of the base or nucleophile.

Although these factors are general traits, they are not absolutes in all circumstances. Additionally, real-life reactions can often lead to the formation of multiple compounds.

In this article, we will explore some of the exceptions and mixtures of compounds commonly observed in these reactions. Exceptions in S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 Reactions

While the factors determining the reaction pathway are usually reliable, there are some notable exceptions to these “rules.” For instance, it is generally accepted that non-basic, non-sterically hindered nucleophiles favor S N 2 reactions.

Still, there are cases where bulky nucleophiles such as sulfonate esters and azides undergo S N 2 reactions despite their bulkiness. In addition, it is commonly thought that primary substrates typically undergo S N 2 reactions, while tertiary substrates undergo E2 reactions.

However, some factors may lead to tertiary carbon undergoing an S N 2 reaction instead of the expected E2 reaction. These factors could include the choice of solvent or the presence of hydrogen bonds in the transition state.

Mixture of Compounds in S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 Reactions

In reality, chemical reactions do not always lead to the production of a single product. One of the most common ways that multiple products can arise is through the formation of a mixture of isomers.

For example, when reacting a haloalkane with a bulky nucleophile like tert-butoxide under typical E2 conditions, stereoisomers can arise because the single product undergoes rotation around the carbon-carbon double bond, resulting in cis/trans isomers. Similarly, when an S N 2 reaction takes place in a chiral center, a mixture of enantiomers or diastereomers arises.

Multiple-Choice Quiz for Practice

1. Which of the following reaction pathways are more likely to occur using a strong base?

a) S N 1

b) S N 2

c) Both E1 and E2

d) None of the above

2. Which of the following solvents favors S N 2 and E2 reactions?

a) Methanol

b) Water

c) Dimethyl sulfoxide

d) Acetone

3. When a non-bulky strong base is used for a primary substrate, which reaction pathway is preferred?

a) S N 2

b) E1

c) S N 1

d) E2

4. Which of the following is an exception to the rule that bulky nucleophiles tend to favor E2 reactions?

a) Sulfonate esters

b) Azides

c) Both a and b

d) None of the above

5. In reactions involving chiral centers, a mixture of ___________ can arise.

a) enantiomers or diastereomers

b) cis/trans isomers

c) both a and b

d) None of the above


1. c



3. a



5. a

In conclusion, while there are general traits that help determine the reaction pathway of S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 reactions, these factors are not absolutes.

The presence of exceptions and mixtures of compounds should always be considered in real-life reactions. Quiz questions similar to those included above can be used for practice and reinforcement of the concepts covered in this article.

Ultimately, it is essential to have a deep understanding of the underlying chemistry to make informed decisions when selecting the appropriate reaction pathway for a given scenario. In conclusion, choosing the appropriate reaction pathway between S N 2, E2, S N 1, and E1 reactions requires careful consideration of various factors such as the strength of the base or nucleophile, substrate structure, solvent polarity, and steric hindrance.

While there are general trends to guide decision-making, exceptions and mixtures of compounds can occur in real-life reactions. It is crucial to understand these exceptions and be aware that multiple compounds can be formed.

By applying knowledge and considering these factors, chemists can navigate the complexities of reaction pathways and achieve desired outcomes.

Popular Posts